http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2008/10/24/second-circuit-no-subject-matter-to-hear-foreign-cubed-case/ Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:33:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2008/10/24/second-circuit-no-subject-matter-to-hear-foreign-cubed-case/comment-page-1/#comment-246 SDNY Dismisses Vodafone Securities Class Action for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:50:12 +0000 http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=2302#comment-246 [...] jurisdiction.  The court relied heavily on the recent Morrison v. National Australia Bank case (discussed here previously), which requires that a court must “identify which action or actions constituted the fraud [...] [...] jurisdiction.  The court relied heavily on the recent Morrison v. National Australia Bank case (discussed here previously), which requires that a court must “identify which action or actions constituted the fraud [...]

]]> http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2008/10/24/second-circuit-no-subject-matter-to-hear-foreign-cubed-case/comment-page-1/#comment-78 “So You’re Telling Me There’s a Chance” Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:59:13 +0000 http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=2302#comment-78 [...] discussed here, this was a case where the lower court dismissed the complaint in a “foreign-cubed” [...] [...] discussed here, this was a case where the lower court dismissed the complaint in a “foreign-cubed” [...]

]]>