<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steal, Hack, Create, Bribe, Seduce&#8230; Just a Few of the Ways to Get Your Hands on Inside Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2008/12/09/steal-hack-create-bribe-seduce-just-a-few-of-the-ways-to-get-your-hands-on-inside-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2008/12/09/steal-hack-create-bribe-seduce-just-a-few-of-the-ways-to-get-your-hands-on-inside-information/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEC v. Dorozhko: Second Circuit Dispenses With Fiduciary Duty Requirement in Hacker Insider Trading Case</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2008/12/09/steal-hack-create-bribe-seduce-just-a-few-of-the-ways-to-get-your-hands-on-inside-information/comment-page-1/#comment-2361</link>
		<dc:creator>SEC v. Dorozhko: Second Circuit Dispenses With Fiduciary Duty Requirement in Hacker Insider Trading Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=3779#comment-2361</guid>
		<description>[...] in December 2008, in this article entitled, &#8220;Steal, Hack, Create, Bribe, Seduce&#8230; Just a Few of the Ways to Get Your Hands [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in December 2008, in this article entitled, &#8220;Steal, Hack, Create, Bribe, Seduce&#8230; Just a Few of the Ways to Get Your Hands [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

