<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attorney for Stanford&#8217;s &#8220;Disaffirmation&#8221; of Prior Statements Was Red Flag for SEC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2009/02/18/attorney-for-stanfords-disaffirmation-of-prior-statements-was-red-flag-for-sec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2009/02/18/attorney-for-stanfords-disaffirmation-of-prior-statements-was-red-flag-for-sec/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:14:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles H. Green</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2009/02/18/attorney-for-stanfords-disaffirmation-of-prior-statements-was-red-flag-for-sec/comment-page-1/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles H. Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=6051#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>The circumlocution of the language (&quot;disaffirmation&quot;) is finally catching up to the hypocrisy and deception in the underlying behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The circumlocution of the language (&#8220;disaffirmation&#8221;) is finally catching up to the hypocrisy and deception in the underlying behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
