<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEC v. Dorozhko: Second Circuit Dispenses With Fiduciary Duty Requirement in Hacker Insider Trading Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2009/07/23/sec-v-dorozhko-second-circuit-dispenses-with-fiduciary-duty-requirement-in-hacker-insider-trading-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2009/07/23/sec-v-dorozhko-second-circuit-dispenses-with-fiduciary-duty-requirement-in-hacker-insider-trading-case/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
</channel>
</rss>

