Archived Version and Materials for Feb. 21 Webcast: The FCPA Compliance Defense — Yes or No?

5 responses to “Archived Version and Materials for Feb. 21 Webcast: The FCPA Compliance Defense — Yes or No?”

1. High Tide: From ‘Unshakeable Fatalism’ At The SFO To An Emergency Wynn Macau … | China News Center

   February 24, 2012, 12:28 am at 12:28 am | Permalink

   […] Americas blog has a primer on language barriers. Howard Sklar and Mike Koehler, the FCPAProfessor, held a webcast battling it out over the need for a compliance defense under the FCPA. Thebriberyact.com has more […]

2. Friday Roundup « FCPA Professor

   February 24, 2012, 10:26 am at 10:26 am | Permalink

   […] Yes Or No” debate between Howard Sklar and I earlier this week on Securities Docket, here is the audio replay (approximately 70 minutes) along with the presentation slides.  At the end of […]

3. Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? | RefineryNews.com

   February 26, 2012, 3:29 am at 3:29 am | Permalink

   […] about a lot, but he’s always reasonable in his positions.  One argument he makes—and made in our recent Compliance Defense debate—is that companies face liability for acts of low-level employees of which senior leaders knew […]

4. Will The SEC Be Put To Its Burden Of Proof In The Jackson And Ruehlen Enforcement Action? « FCPA Professor

   February 28, 2012, 10:06 am at 10:06 am | Permalink

   […] participated in a discussion with Howard Sklar regarding a potential FCPA compliance defense (see here for the webcast.)  In the aftermath of the SEC’s charges against the Noble executives, […]

5. Further Thoughts On A Compliance Defense « FCPA Professor

   September 4, 2012, 9:11 am at 9:11 am | Permalink

   […] have debated an FCPA compliance defense with Howard Sklar (see here).  His main objection to a defense seems to be that if there is such a defense, an FCPA inquiry […]

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.