<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Securities DocketCriminal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/category/criminal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Feb. 29 Webcast: Recent Developments in FCPA and International Anti-Corruption Enforcement and Compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/09/feb-29-webcast-recent-developments-in-fcpa-and-international-anti-corruption-enforcement-and-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/09/feb-29-webcast-recent-developments-in-fcpa-and-international-anti-corruption-enforcement-and-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SD Insider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Bribery Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=28100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PLease join F. Joseph Warin, Benno Schwarz, Michael Diamant and Joseph Spinelli for this free webcast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2011 and the first few months of 2012 marked yet another dynamic period for the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and saw the launch of the UK Bribery Act.  The last 14 months included a torrent of enforcement activity, more trials than in any other year in the history of the FCPA, aggressive individual prosecutions by DOJ and the SEC, novel civil law suits piggybacking on FCPA matters, and an increasing interplay between the FCPA and other international laws prohibiting cross-border bribery.</p>
<p>Join a webcast with an experienced panel of anti-corruption compliance practitioners that will cover the key trends shaping anti-corruption enforcement and provide practical views on how companies can update their anti-corruption compliance programs to meet the many challenges facing business today.  In particular, the webcast will</p>
<ol>
<li>summarize global anti-corruption enforcement trends in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and other key countries;</li>
<li>recap the latest FCPA trials and their implications;</li>
<li>address today’s best practices for establishing and refreshing an effective anti-corruption compliance program; and</li>
<li>look at the importance of risk-based third-party due diligence.</li>
</ol>
<p>The panel’s collective knowledge, gained from advising clients daily on the legal and business challenges posed in this area, will benefit directors, senior executives, in-house counsel, and compliance personnel alike.</p>
<p><strong>Presenters</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>F.      Joseph Warin</strong> serves as chair of the Litigation Department for Gibson      Dunn’s Washington, D.C. office and as co-chair of the firm’s White Collar      Defense and Investigations group.  A recognized expert in the FCPA      and U.K. Bribery Act, Mr. Warin has served or is serving as FCPA      compliance monitor (or counsel to the first non-U.S. FCPA compliance      monitor) for three companies.</li>
<li><strong>Benno      Schwarz</strong> is a member of Gibson Dunn’s White Collar Defense and      Investigations and International Corporate Transactions groups.  Based      in Gibson Dunn’s Munich office, Mr. Schwarz is an expert in global      anti-corruption compliance having conducted corruption-related internal      investigations throughout the EU, Russia, and China.</li>
<li><strong>Michael      Diamant</strong> is a partner in      Gibson Dunn’s Washington, D.C. office and practices in its White Collar      Defense and Investigations group.       Mr. Diamant is an expert on the FCPA, the UK Bribery Act, and      corporate compliance issues.</li>
<li><strong>Joseph Spinelli</strong> is a Managing      Director in Navigant’s Global Investigations and Compliance segment and is      a leading authority on white-collar crime matters with more than 30 years      of forensic investigations experience, including as a special agent in the      FBI and a principle in a Big Four accounting firm.</li>
</ul>
<p>To attend this free webcast scheduled for Wednesday, February 29, at 12 pm Eastern, please sign up below.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="589" height="551" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="data" value="http://www.brighttalk.com/clients/flashplatform/viewer/no_channel/loader.swf" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="flashvars" value="channelid=513&amp;commid=42183&amp;autoStart=false&amp;fromdc=false&amp;css=" /><param name="src" value="http://www.brighttalk.com/clients/flashplatform/viewer/no_channel/loader.swf" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="589" height="551" src="http://www.brighttalk.com/clients/flashplatform/viewer/no_channel/loader.swf" flashvars="channelid=513&amp;commid=42183&amp;autoStart=false&amp;fromdc=false&amp;css=" wmode="transparent" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" data="http://www.brighttalk.com/clients/flashplatform/viewer/no_channel/loader.swf"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/09/feb-29-webcast-recent-developments-in-fcpa-and-international-anti-corruption-enforcement-and-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prosecutors: Gupta wasn&#8217;t Rajaratnam&#8217;s only insider &#8211; Bloomberg</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/09/prosecutors-gupta-wasnt-rajaratnams-only-insider-bloomberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/09/prosecutors-gupta-wasnt-rajaratnams-only-insider-bloomberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=28095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A second “insider” at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. allegedly leaked tips to hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam, U.S. prosecutors told the judge presiding over the case of former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta. The government&#8217;s disclosure about another Goldman Sachs tipster for Mr. Rajaratnam, who was convicted of insider trading in May, came during Tuesday&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A second “insider” at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. allegedly leaked tips to hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam, U.S. prosecutors told the judge presiding over the case of former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta.</p>
<p>The government&#8217;s disclosure about another Goldman Sachs tipster for Mr. Rajaratnam, who was convicted of insider trading in May, came during Tuesday&#8217;s arraignment of Mr. Gupta on revised insider-trading charges that broaden the scope of the alleged conspiracy. Mr. Gupta, 63, pleaded not guilty.</p></blockquote>
<div>via <a href="http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20120208/FINANCE/120209892/1072#">Prosecutors: Gupta wasn&#8217;t Rajaratnam&#8217;s only insider</a> &#8211; Bloomberg</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/09/prosecutors-gupta-wasnt-rajaratnams-only-insider-bloomberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preet Bharara’s toothless bite of Wall Street &#8211; Salon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/08/preet-bharara%e2%80%99s-toothless-bite-of-wall-street-salon-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/08/preet-bharara%e2%80%99s-toothless-bite-of-wall-street-salon-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prosecutors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=28053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Preet Bharara is not busting Wall Street. He’s not collaring the masters of the meltdown"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preet Bharara is not busting Wall Street. He’s not collaring the masters of the meltdown. He’s done nothing to even slightly discomfit Wall Street’s still-ferocious money machine, or has yet to bring to justice the architects, enablers and continuers of the 2008 financial crisis — the bankers who got us into that mess, and the ones who are continuing to extract pain from foreclosed homeowners, in the New York area and beyond.</p>
<p>As a matter of fact, his over-hyped insider-trading prosecutions, the main focus of the Time piece, are doing the Street a favor, by targeting people who actually ripped off Wall Street — individuals like hedge fund managers Raj Rajaratnam and Danielle Chiesi, who functioned a bit like the goons who used to dope race horses in the old days.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/preet_bhararas_toothless_bite_of_wall_street/singleton/">Preet Bharara’s toothless bite of Wall Street &#8211; Salon.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/08/preet-bharara%e2%80%99s-toothless-bite-of-wall-street-salon-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STOCK Act heads for House vote &#8211; CBS News</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/08/stock-act-heads-for-house-vote-cbs-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/08/stock-act-heads-for-house-vote-cbs-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STOCK Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=28047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House vote expected Thursday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As the STOCK Act, a bill to stop insider trading by members of Congress, heads to the House of Representatives after passing a Senate vote, the House Democratic leader has become a specific target of the legislation. There are jobs bills and a payroll tax extension mired in Washington gridlock, but the STOCK Act is sailing through Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support, with a House vote expected Thursday.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505267_162-57373073/stock-act-heads-for-house-vote/">STOCK Act heads for House vote &#8211; CBS News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/08/stock-act-heads-for-house-vote-cbs-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 21 Webcast: The FCPA Compliance Defense &#8212; Yes or No?</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/07/february-21-webcast-the-fcpa-compliance-defense-yes-or-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/07/february-21-webcast-the-fcpa-compliance-defense-yes-or-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SD Insider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=28040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please join Professor Mike Koehler and Howard Sklar for this free webcast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should a company’s pre-existing compliance policies and good faith commitment to FCPA compliance be a defense when FCPA violations by its non-executive employees or agents are uncovered? This critical question has been hotly-debated by members of the business community, law enforcement and even in Congress in recent months as FCPA prosecutions against companies continue to surge.</p>
<p>In this webcast, two of the leading commentators in the FCPA area&#8211;Professor Mike Koehler and Howard Sklar-present sharply conflicting opinions on this key issue. Drawing upon his just-released paper on the topic (“<a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1982656">Revisiting a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance Defense</a>”), Professor Koehler will argue in favor of Congress creating an FCPA compliance defense. He will explain why the unique aspects and challenges of complying with the FCPA in the global marketplace warrant a specific FCPA compliance defense and how the DOJ already recognizes a <em>de facto</em> FCPA compliance defense, albeit in opaque, inconsistent and unpredictable ways.</p>
<p>On the other side of the issue, however, Howard Sklar contends that there are two overriding reasons why Congress should not include a compliance defense to violations of the FCPA. Sklar contends that corporations will not see any incremental benefit from making effective compliance a defense, and, moreover, that taking discretion out of the hands of the prosecutors will create unintended and adverse consequences that will more than offset any slight benefit corporations see. In short, he will explain how the end result of any FCPA compliance defense would be a weakening, not a strengthening, of corporate compliance programs.</p>
<p>Please join panelists <strong>Mike Koehler</strong>, Assistant Professor of Business Law at Butler University; and <strong>Howard Sklar</strong>, Senior Counsel, Recommind, as they address these issues and your questions in this free webcast. To attend this webcast scheduled for Tuesday, February 21, at 1 pm Eastern, please sign up below.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="589" height="551" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="data" value="http://www.brighttalk.com/clients/flashplatform/viewer/no_channel/loader.swf" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="flashvars" value="channelid=513&amp;commid=41981&amp;autoStart=false&amp;fromdc=false&amp;css=" /><param name="src" value="http://www.brighttalk.com/clients/flashplatform/viewer/no_channel/loader.swf" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="589" height="551" src="http://www.brighttalk.com/clients/flashplatform/viewer/no_channel/loader.swf" flashvars="channelid=513&amp;commid=41981&amp;autoStart=false&amp;fromdc=false&amp;css=" wmode="transparent" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" data="http://www.brighttalk.com/clients/flashplatform/viewer/no_channel/loader.swf"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/07/february-21-webcast-the-fcpa-compliance-defense-yes-or-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanford had secret fund for bribes, yacht-witness</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/04/stanford-had-secret-fund-for-bribes-yacht-witness-reuters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/04/stanford-had-secret-fund-for-bribes-yacht-witness-reuters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponzis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=27992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Witness in Stanford trial describes secret Swiss bank account for personal expenses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Texas financier Allen Stanford drew on a secret Swiss bank account for personal expenses like yacht maintenance and to pay bribes, the government&#8217;s top witness said at Stanford&#8217;s fraud trial on Friday.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Securities/News/2012/02_-_February/Stanford_had_secret_fund_for_bribes,_yacht-witness/">Stanford had secret fund for bribes, yacht-witness</a>. &#8212; Reuters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/04/stanford-had-secret-fund-for-bribes-yacht-witness-reuters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why three senators said no to an insider trading ban in Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/why-three-senators-said-no-to-an-insider-trading-ban-in-congress-the-term-sheet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/why-three-senators-said-no-to-an-insider-trading-ban-in-congress-the-term-sheet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STOCK Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=27987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican Sens. Richard Burr (N.C.), Tom Coburn (Okla.) and Democratic Sen. Jeff Bingaman (N.M.) vote against STOCK Act.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The measure the Senate approved Thursday to ban lawmakers from stock trading on inside information didn&#8217;t just pass. It waltzed through the chamber, gathering a whopping 96-vote majority in a bipartisan display that&#8217;s become rare in the extreme these days&#8230;. So considering the bill could have as easily been called the No Brainer Act, how could anyone vote against it? Well, three people found reasons: Republican Sens. Richard Burr (N.C.) and Tom Coburn (Okla.) and Democratic Sen. Jeff Bingaman (N.M.).</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/03/congress-insider-trading/?section=magazines_fortune">Why three senators said no to an insider trading ban in Congress &#8211; The Term Sheet</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/why-three-senators-said-no-to-an-insider-trading-ban-in-congress-the-term-sheet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Passes STOCK Act, House Will Consider Bill Next Week</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/senate-passes-stock-act-house-will-consider-bill-next-week-compliance-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/senate-passes-stock-act-house-will-consider-bill-next-week-compliance-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STOCK Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=27947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 96-3 vote in Senate, House is expected to consider the Senate-passed STOCK Act next week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On Thursday, February 2, the Senate voted 96-3 in favor of its version of the STOCK Act, which bans members of Congress and their staff from trading based on inside information. The House is expected to consider the Senate-passed STOCK Act on the House floor next week.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.complianceweek.com/senate-passes-stock-act-house-will-consider-bill-next-week/article/226151/">Senate Passes STOCK Act, House Will Consider Bill Next Week &#8211; Compliance Week</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/senate-passes-stock-act-house-will-consider-bill-next-week-compliance-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ’s Hank Walther Joins Jones Day in Washington, DC</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/dojs-hank-walther-joins-jones-day-in-washington-dc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/dojs-hank-walther-joins-jones-day-in-washington-dc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prosecutors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=27942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former DOJ supervisor in the FCPA Unit joins Jones Day in Washington, DC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hank Walther has joined Jones Day as a partner in the firm&#8217;s Corporate Criminal Investigations Practice. Prior to joining Jones Day, Walther served as chief of the Health Care Fraud Unit in the U.S. Department of Justice, where he supervised all health care fraud investigations and prosecutions pursued by the Criminal Division. During his tenure at the DOJ, Walther was also a supervisor in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Unit, where he oversaw foreign corruption investigations and prosecutions and coordinated with U.S. and foreign law enforcement, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other federal agencies.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.jonesday.com/doj-health-care-chief-and-former-fcpa-assistant-chief-to-join-jones-day-01-03-2012/">DOJ Health Care Chief and Former FCPA Assistant Chief joins Jones Day</a>.&#8211;Jones Day press release</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/dojs-hank-walther-joins-jones-day-in-washington-dc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>R. Allen Stanford’s money man knew it was fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/r-allen-stanford%e2%80%99s-money-man-knew-it-was-fraud-nypost-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/r-allen-stanford%e2%80%99s-money-man-knew-it-was-fraud-nypost-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponzis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=27940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Davis testifies about deception. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>James Davis, a college roommate of Stanford’s who went on to become his moneyman, told a federal jury in Houston yesterday that in the summer of 1991 Stanford handed him a document and asked him to fly with it to London. There, he was to take the document to a 10-foot square cubicle and fax it to a potential client. The purpose of the trip, Davis testified, was to hide the fact that the company named on the document’s letterhead, British Insurance Fund Limited, didn’t actually exist&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/stanford_moneyman_knew_it_was_fraud_Rp7QXo0eyxY9EYT6S88IDM?CMP=OTC-rss">R. Allen Stanford’s money man knew it was fraud &#8211; NYPOST.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/02/03/r-allen-stanford%e2%80%99s-money-man-knew-it-was-fraud-nypost-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

