<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Securities DocketRegulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/category/regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CFTC’s New Whistleblower Office Hires First Director</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/01/06/cftcs-new-whistleblower-office-hires-first-director-compliance-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/01/06/cftcs-new-whistleblower-office-hires-first-director-compliance-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=27462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like SEC, CFTC establishes new whistleblower office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The SEC&#8217;s whistleblower office, mandated by Dodd-Frank, has gotten a considerable amount of press here and elsewhere. Not as well known, however, is the fact that Dodd-Frank also required the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to create a whistleblower office, and that office got on its feet today with the announcement that the CFTC has hired its first director.</p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.complianceweek.com/cftcs-new-whistleblower-office-hires-first-director/article/222179/">CFTC\&#8217;s New Whistleblower Office Hires First Director &#8211; Compliance Week</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2012/01/06/cftcs-new-whistleblower-office-hires-first-director-compliance-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With Glut of Vacant Jobs, SEC Turns to Headhunter for Help</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2011/05/25/with-glut-of-vacant-jobs-sec-turns-to-headhunter-for-help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2011/05/25/with-glut-of-vacant-jobs-sec-turns-to-headhunter-for-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 10:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2011/05/25/with-glut-of-vacant-jobs-sec-turns-to-headhunter-for-help/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEC must use its recruiting budget by end of 2011 fiscal year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s imperative that the SEC fill the jobs before the end of the fiscal year in September, Enforcement Division head Robert Khuzami told a securities law conference earlier this month. The agency got a $70 million bump in funding which will go toward new hires, “but we only have five months to do it,” he said. “All of a sudden we have to push through a lot of hires, because if we don’t spend the money by the end of the fiscal year, it’s gone.”</p></blockquote>
<p><a class="publish2_link publish2_read_more" href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/05/headhunter-used-to-fill-sec-attorney-vacancies.html">Read more: With Glut of Vacant Jobs, SEC Turns to Headhunter for Help — Blog of the Legal Times</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2011/05/25/with-glut-of-vacant-jobs-sec-turns-to-headhunter-for-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Soon in Cinemas: Lawyer Ads for Whistleblowers</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/09/21/coming-soon-in-cinemas-lawyer-ads-for-whistleblowers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/09/21/coming-soon-in-cinemas-lawyer-ads-for-whistleblowers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=20621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coming soon to a theater near you: lawyer ads for whistleblowers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/movies230.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-20622" title="movies230" src="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/movies230-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>From Compliance Week&#8217;s Enforcement Action blog:</p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote><p>As I have <a href="http://www.complianceweek.com/Article/6142/pitfalls-emerge-in-dodd-frank-bounty-provision">noted before</a>,  plaintiffs’ lawyers believe they may have been handed a very lucrative  new practice area with the passage of the whistleblower provisions in  Dodd-Frank. But not all plaintiffs’ counsel are simply going to wait for their  ship to come in here. Some are going to swim out  and meet it, and if that meeting has to take place at select movie  theaters in New York then so be it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more from <a href="http://www.complianceweek.com/blog/carton/2010/09/20/coming-soon-in-cinemas-lawyer-ads-for-whistleblowers/">Coming Soon in Cinemas: Lawyer Ads for Whistleblowers</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/09/21/coming-soon-in-cinemas-lawyer-ads-for-whistleblowers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New &#8216;Anti-Claw Back&#8217; Bill May Help Madoff Victims</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/21/new-anti-claw-back-bill-may-help-madoff-victims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/21/new-anti-claw-back-bill-may-help-madoff-victims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Harding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madoff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=18373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill would retroactively apply to Madoff victims.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/madoffcourt230.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-11182" src="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/madoffcourt230-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>On Friday, a group of legislators introduced a bill that could change how the Securities Investor Protection Corp. collects illegally obtained  funds to return to Ponzi scheme victims.</p>
<p>Following criticism of SIPC for trying to &#8220;claw back&#8221; ill-gotten gains from investors who profited from Bernard Madoff&#8217;s Ponzi scheme (in order to redistribute the funds to investors who lost money), US Reps. Gary Ackerman, Peter King and four other Congressmen have presented a bill that would bar such claw backs. The bill would retroactively allow hundreds of Madoff victims to resist SIPC&#8217;s efforts to recover their profits, the New York Post reports.</p>
<p>The bill would also require SIPC to provide up to $100,000 in insurance  coverage to investors who invest in Ponzi schemes indirectly, such as  through funds of hedge funds. Currently, SIPC insurance covers up to $500,000 for investors who invested directly in a scheme.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/bill_helps_madoff_victims_49tmcCM6JjObhEBiwO412J?CMP=OTC-rss&amp;FEEDNAME=">Read the New York Post article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/21/new-anti-claw-back-bill-may-help-madoff-victims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Announcements on Financial Performance Now Exclusively Released On Its IR Website</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/21/googles-announcements-on-financial-performance-now-exclusively-released-on-its-ir-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/21/googles-announcements-on-financial-performance-now-exclusively-released-on-its-ir-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Harding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation FD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=18380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google will make financial disclosures exclusively on this "recognized channel."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/google230.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-18379" src="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/google230-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>On Thursday, Google announced that it will now make announcements about its financial performance solely through its investor relations website. According to the IR Web Report, Google is the most prominent company to take advantage of the SEC&#8217;s 2008 ruling on website disclosure under Regulation FD.</p>
<p>In the 2008 release, the SEC cautioned that companies could only use their websites for  such disclosure if their websites were a “recognized channel” for investors, according to the IR Web Report.  The release also gave a list of non-exclusive factors for companies to  consider when evaluating whether their websites and their investors were  ready for web-based disclosure.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irwebreport.com/daily/2010/04/16/google-moves-to-web-disclosure-for-reg-fd/">Read the IR Web Report post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/21/googles-announcements-on-financial-performance-now-exclusively-released-on-its-ir-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Considers Requiring Detailed Findings of Investigations in Settlement Agreements</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/02/sec-considers-publicizing-detailed-findings-of-investigations-in-settlement-agreements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/02/sec-considers-publicizing-detailed-findings-of-investigations-in-settlement-agreements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Harding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=17980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The agency may require detailed findings in settlement agreements. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/SEC230.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-10839" src="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/SEC230-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>On Thursday, the Washington Post reported that the SEC is considering including detailed findings from investigations in its settlement agreements. Currently, companies and executives that reach settlement agreements with the SEC must pay fines and agree to other penalties, but are not required to admit to any wrongdoing.</p>
<p>The Washington Post reports that this idea comes on the heels of harsh criticism regarding the agency&#8217;s handling of the <a href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/02/05/bank-of-america-agrees-to-pay-150-million-to-settle-sec-case/">Bank of America settlement</a>. Enforcement Director Rob Khuzami told the Washington Post that &#8220;[t]ypically our practice has been not to file in-depth factual findings of the investigation. We&#8217;re taking a look at the practice and deciding whether it makes sense to provide a more fulsome record&#8221; in an effort to be more transparent.</p>
<p>Some supporters of the idea such as Columbia University law professor John Coffee say that the current SEC settlement document is an &#8220;artifact&#8221; as &#8220;the SEC is premised on the idea that sunlight is the best disinfectant, and a nontransparent settlement harms the SEC&#8217;s reputation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some lawyers like Russell G. Ryan of King &amp; Spalding say, however, that inserting more details in settlements might make companies more reluctant to agree to a settlement.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/31/AR2010033103674.html?hpid=topnews">Read the Washington Post article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/02/sec-considers-publicizing-detailed-findings-of-investigations-in-settlement-agreements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Week’s CDS Case to Answer Jurisdictional Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/01/next-week%e2%80%99s-cds-case-to-answer-jurisdictional-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/01/next-week%e2%80%99s-cds-case-to-answer-jurisdictional-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 04:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Harding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=17938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upcoming case will test boundaries of the SEC's jurisdiction in CDS markets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/SECheadquarters230.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-10820" src="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/SECheadquarters230-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Back in May 2009, the SEC generated significant publicity when it <a href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2009/05/05/sec-files-first-ever-insider-trading-case-involving-credit-default-swaps/">brought a case</a> against Renato Negrin, a former portfolio manager at hedge fund investment adviser Millennium Partners L.P., and Jon-Paul Rorech, a salesman at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., with insider trading in credit default swaps of VNU N.V. The SEC noted at the time that the case represented its first insider trading enforcement action involving credit default swaps.</p>
<p>The case is set to go to trial next week in federal court in New York, and has sparked a broader debate as to whether the SEC has jurisdiction to pursue it at all. Full details are available in <a href="http://www.complianceweek.com/blog/carton/2010/03/31/next-weeks-cds-case-to-answer-jurisdictional-issue/">this post on my Enforcement Action blog</a> over at Compliance Week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/04/01/next-week%e2%80%99s-cds-case-to-answer-jurisdictional-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNBC Video: Sen. Dodd Unveils Financial Regulation Reform Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/03/15/cnbc-video-sen-dodd-unveils-financial-regulation-reform-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/03/15/cnbc-video-sen-dodd-unveils-financial-regulation-reform-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Securities Docket</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=17504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Dodd announces his new bill on Capitol Hill.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This afternoon, Sen. Chris Dodd unveiled his eagerly-awaited financial regulation reform bill. This video shows Dodd announcing and describing the bill today on Capitol Hill. Dodd vowed that there will be a financial regulation reform bill passed this year in Congress.</p>
<p><object id="cnbcplayer" height="380" width="400" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" ><param name="type" value="application/x-shockwave-flash"/><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/><param name="quality" value="best"/><param name="scale" value="noscale" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"/><param name="salign" value="lt"/><param name="movie" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1441660001/code/cnbcplayershare"/><embed name="cnbcplayer" PLUGINSPAGE="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" height="380" width="400" quality="best" wmode="transparent" scale="noscale" salign="lt" src="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1441660001/code/cnbcplayershare" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><br />
</object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/03/15/cnbc-video-sen-dodd-unveils-financial-regulation-reform-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada: ASC Settles Insider Case Against Bradley Arthur Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/03/02/canada-asc-settles-insider-case-against-bradley-arthur-wilson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/03/02/canada-asc-settles-insider-case-against-bradley-arthur-wilson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Harding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=17199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ASc settles insider trading case with former operations manager for Alberta Clipper Energy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2010/26/c5295.html"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-16318" src="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ASC230-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>The Alberta Securities Commission announced on Friday that it reached a <a href="http://www.albertasecurities.com/Enforcement/Enforcement%20Orders/WILSON%20Bradley%20Arthur%20SAU%202010%2002%2025%203434633%20v1.pdf">settlement agreement</a> with Bradley Arthur Wilson. ASC charged Wilson with insider trading in connection with Alberta Clipper Energy Inc. shares.</p>
<p>Wilson worked as the operations manager for Alberta Clipper Energy Inc.  He admitted to purchasing shares of the company in 2006, after learning of nonpublic drilling results. He also admitted that after the information was made public, he sold the shares to make a profit of approximately $29,400.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2010/26/c5295.html">Read the press release</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/03/02/canada-asc-settles-insider-case-against-bradley-arthur-wilson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Undercover Operations Coming From DOJ in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/03/02/more-undercover-operations-coming-from-doj-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/03/02/more-undercover-operations-coming-from-doj-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Harding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undercover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitiesdocket.com/?p=17190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lanny Breuer speaks on undercover operations in white collar crime enforcement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/storydojseal230.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-13175" src="http://www.securitiesdocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/storydojseal230-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>The Department of Justice will continue to employ undercover operations to investigate financial fraud in 2010. Speaking at the American Bar Association&#8217;s White Collar Crime conference on Thursday, Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer stated that the DOJ will be more targeted, creative and strategic when investigating financial fraud.</p>
<p>According to the Miami Herald, Breuer cited the success of the court-authorized wiretaps and confidential sources used in the Galleon case. He also noted the FBI sting operation that resulted in the indictment of 22 executives and employees who work for suppliers to military and law-enforcement agencies. This case was the largest prosecution of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to date. Breuer said these undercover operations are a &#8220;new chapter in white collar crime enforcement.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/02/25/1499642/top-justice-department-official.html">Read the Miami Herald article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitiesdocket.com/2010/03/02/more-undercover-operations-coming-from-doj-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

