• Home
  • About
  • Webcasts
  • ‘Enforcement 40’ for 2020
  • Enforcement Hall of Fame
  • Contact
Securities Docket
Securities-Docket-Leaderboard_9Sec
  • Class Actions
  • Criminal
  • Global
  • People
  • SD Insider
  • SEC
  • Video
  • Subscribe by email
  • Subscribe
Browse: Home / 2011 / June / 01 / Q&A – Professor finds flaws in U.S. anti-bribery enforcement

Q&A – Professor finds flaws in U.S. anti-bribery enforcement

By Securities Docket on June 1, 2011, 6:06 pm

Mike Koehler: That the FCPA is a fundamentally sound statute does not mean that FCPA enforcement is fundamentally sound. I, along with many others, have serious concerns about FCPA enforcement across a wide spectrum. On one end, many enforcement theories seem to be contrary to the intent of Congress in passing the FCPA and indeed, in certain cases, contrary to the statute itself. On the other end, the most egregious instances of corporate bribery are resolved without FCPA anti-bribery charges.

Read more: Q&A – Professor finds flaws in U.S. anti-bribery enforcement — TrustLaw

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Posted in Criminal, SEC | Tagged Anti-corruption

« Previous Next »

‘Enforcement 40’ for 2020

Ankura 260x250

Our Sponsors

Securities-Docket_260x125_14Sec Ankura 260x125

Join Us On LinkedIn

Join the Securities Litigation and Enforcement Group on LinkedIn

Archives

Copyright © 2021 Securities Docket.

Powered by WordPress and Hybrid.