• Home
  • About
  • ‘Enforcement 40’ for 2020
  • Webcasts
  • Enforcement Hall of Fame
  • Contact
Securities Docket
FTI 480x60
  • Class Actions
  • Criminal
  • Global
  • People
  • SD Insider
  • SEC
  • Video
  • Subscribe by email
  • Subscribe
Browse: Home / 2012 / October / 25 / Judging if Wiretaps Are Necessary – DealBook

Judging if Wiretaps Are Necessary – DealBook

By Securities Docket on October 25, 2012, 4:25 pm

“Necessity” is a simple word that means “an imperative requirement or need for something.” In Raj Rajaratnam’s appeal of his convictions for conspiracy and insider trading that will be heard on Thursday by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the critical issue will be whether the government established that it needed to use wiretaps because other avenues of investigation were not fruitful….

If a wiretap was not properly authorized, the statute prohibits using the evidence at a trial. For Mr. Rajaratnam, that would lead to reversal of his convictions because the wiretaps were crucial to proving the case.

via Judging if Wiretaps Are Necessary – DealBook

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Posted in Criminal | Tagged Appellate, Raj Rajaratnam, Web Watch, Wiretaps

« Previous Next »

Subscribe

‘Enforcement 40’ for 2020

Securities-Docket_Medium-Rectangle_CaseStudyArrow

Our Sponsors

Securities-Docket_260x125_14Sec Ankura 260x125

Join Us On LinkedIn

Join the Securities Litigation and Enforcement Group on LinkedIn

Archives

Copyright © 2022 Securities Docket.

Powered by WordPress and Hybrid.