The defense of Mr. Walters is a claim that he has a better account for his trading that does not involve inside information, but it does not eliminate the possibility that Mr. Davis was one of his tells in assessing the companies for an investment. Is that really a claim of innocence or an alternative explanation that raises enough doubt for the jury to return a not guilty verdict?
‘Enforcement 40’ for 2020
Join Us On LinkedIn
Join the Securities Litigation and Enforcement Group on LinkedIn