• Home
  • About
  • Webcasts
  • ‘Enforcement 40’ for 2020
  • Enforcement Hall of Fame
  • Contact
Securities Docket
Securities-Docket-Leaderboard_9Sec
  • Class Actions
  • Criminal
  • Global
  • People
  • SD Insider
  • SEC
  • Video
  • Subscribe by email
  • Subscribe
Browse: Home / 2020 / June / 05 / Is Insider Trading Prosecution Unconstitutional? Ex-Apple Attorney’s Counsel Still Says Yes | Corporate Counsel

Is Insider Trading Prosecution Unconstitutional? Ex-Apple Attorney’s Counsel Still Says Yes | Corporate Counsel

By Securities Docket on June 5, 2020, 8:47 am

In April, Levoff’s attorney, Kevin Marino, founding partner at Marino, Tortorella & Boyle in Chatham, New Jersey, moved to dismiss the charges arguing that insider trading has never been made into law by Congress. He said the definition of insider trading has been created by judges and the prosecution of insider trading is unconstitutional.

via Is Insider Trading Prosecution Unconstitutional? Ex-Apple Attorney’s Counsel Still Says Yes | Corporate Counsel.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Posted in Criminal, Top | Tagged Insider Trading

« Previous Next »

‘Enforcement 40’ for 2020

Ankura 260x250

Our Sponsors

Securities-Docket_260x125_14Sec Ankura 260x125

Join Us On LinkedIn

Join the Securities Litigation and Enforcement Group on LinkedIn

Archives

Copyright © 2021 Securities Docket.

Powered by WordPress and Hybrid.